Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKlink, B.M.J. vanen_US
dc.contributor.authorLembcke, O.W.L.en_US
dc.contributor.editorKlink, B.M.J.vanen_US
dc.contributor.editorTaekema, H.S.en_US
dc.contributor.editorBeen, W.deen_US
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-30T13:59:43Z
dc.date.available2017-01-30T13:59:43Z
dc.date.issued2016en_US
dc.identifier.citationIn: B.M.J. van Klink, H.S. Taekema, W. de Been (Ed.), Facts and Norms in Law. Interdisciplinary Reflections on Legal Method (pp. 201-223). Cheltenham: Edward Elgaren_US
dc.identifier.isbn9781785361081
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1871/55155
dc.publisherEdward Elgaren_US
dc.relation.uri10.4337/9781785361098
dc.titleExploring the Boundaries of Law. On the Is-Ought Distinction in Jellinek and Kelsenen_US
dc.typeArticle in monograph or in proceedingsen_US
dc.creator.metisIdVU1012366
dc.creator.metisIdVU1149962
dc.identifier.metisId357594
dc.provenance.metis2016-08-15 00:00
dc.publisher.placeCheltenhamen_US
dc.source.journalTitleFacts and Norms in Law. Interdisciplinary Reflections on Legal Methoden_US
dc.source.startpage201
dc.source.endpage223
dc.creator.facultynl_NL
dc.coverage.researchinstituteVU RCH 004nl_NL
metis.upload.processedtrue
workflow.metistrue


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record